I have been deeply moved by the agrarian crises,
the spate of suicides that consumed over two and a half lakhs farmers’ causing
immense distress to the families. My thoughts also centred on food and
environment security in coming years and our moral responsibility towards our
children and coming generations, if this crises persisted.
Rather than just brood and fret about it, I decided to do
something about it. In the year 2008, the first opportunity came to study the
impact of a few projects of inclusive growth in the states of Kerala,
Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.
The key finding of
this study was that even as there were some attempts at inclusion of poor and
deprived sections, there was concomitant process of systemic “exclusion” that
was driving a much larger section of people into poverty and deprivation. For a
long time, I wondered why people should bear with such an exploitative and
extortionary system. Why were government and non-government programs focused on
wider and sustainable development oblivious to this aspect?
The key challenges were pricing of farm and other primary
produce in the rural areas and the kind of education and skill-building
programs that children and youth were being subjected to. There was also the
issue of social and cultural alienation of people educated in ways that drove
them away from their roots. The pricing failed to cover the higher input costs,
risks and uncertainties of rural production where as the education and skill
development seemed to be at odds with their basic needs.
For the next 2 years, I was involved in the anti-corruption
movement but that too was confined to Delhi. I did explore staying in a rural
area for a period to study and understand the situation at the grassroots
level. It was only in Feb. ’13 that the first opportunity to do so arose.
This was as a week-long workshop in a village called Govindpur khiri in Bijnaur district in Uttar Pradesh. This was addressed by noted expert on traditional socio-economic system in India Sh. Ravindra Sharma. This opened my eyes to an alternative development model that’s truly inclusive and sustainable unlike the current model. This also gave me an opportunity to stay and feel the beauty and richness of traditional village life and how it was being ruptured by misplaced notion of development.
This was as a week-long workshop in a village called Govindpur khiri in Bijnaur district in Uttar Pradesh. This was addressed by noted expert on traditional socio-economic system in India Sh. Ravindra Sharma. This opened my eyes to an alternative development model that’s truly inclusive and sustainable unlike the current model. This also gave me an opportunity to stay and feel the beauty and richness of traditional village life and how it was being ruptured by misplaced notion of development.
A further opportunity came to stay in a village near Wardha
in Vidarbha where I could reflect upon what I had learnt from Sh. Ravindra
Sharma. I stayed for over a fortnight with the Kathiawadi cowherder community
in a village called Tigaon-Amla. With meager resources, this community of about
40 people is able to look after about 400 Gir cows.
This is a hardworking community where women and children are
integral to the overall work responsibilities. They supply valuable milk to the
nearby town of Wardha. They follow natural breeding, keeping and pasturing
practices as a result of which their cows are in good health and have fairly
good milk productivity.
They migrated nearly 5 decades back to Vidarbha and other
parts of Maharashtra. This is a close-knit traditional community that has stuck
to its roots even as it has adapted reasonably well to local conditions. By the
estimate of one of their elders, the number of Gir cows in Maharashtra reached
a peak of 50lakhs about 10 years back and has since declined to 13 lakhs.
Yet, because of Pricing and Education, the community faces a
crises in various proportions. There are a variety of reasons due to which milk
being a valuable and essential commodity in many households has not been able
to find an appropriate price point.
First and foremost, as a perishable commodity with a shelf
life of just a few hours and even less during long summer season, milk
producers are at a loss. This also cannot be sold to faraway markets. The price
distortion is forced upon them by the government machinery that administers the
price of milk. In search of a stable customer base, the cowherder community
which is already pressed for time and is under great stress due to depleting
pastures, rising fodder costs, cost of living and the distraction of its
younger generation who are under various pressure to move away from their
traditional sources of livelihood.
So, when I assessed the situation on the ground, I advised
them to process milk and to sell value added products such as butter and ghee,
with longer shelf life. Butter and ghee, along with butter milk from this
source, produced in a traditional way, fetches a high premium in markets both
as medicine and food. There is also a medicinal market for cow urine and cow
dung from this source, which could reduce their dependency on selling milk to
buy fodder for cows.
This will also allow
them to get a better price for their milk commensurate to the input costs, the
efforts put in and the risks and uncertainties. Without that the younger people
of the community are tempted to sell the calves and thus deplete their asset
base for some easy money.
Ironically, the Education of these children and youth leaves
a lot to be desired in learning appropriate skills and to enrich their lives.
The more therefore “educated” they are, the more distracted they get to veer
away from their traditional livelihoods. This is indeed a tricky issue of
freedom of education and needs lots more attention.
During my stay, I explored how milk could be supplied to the
adjoining village community, which I was told does not consume milk. The
grapevine was that they would rather pay lots more for country liquor than pay
for milk. It was also shared that their children were not adapted to taking
milk. However, when I met up with the children in the village school, I found
that the reality was very different than what was gossiped. The children did
want milk and said so vocally in front of the principal and other prominent
people of the village, who I accompanied. In fact, they did produce some milk
in the village from the local Gavrani breed that sold at Rs. 40 per litres
while the Kathiawadi community was selling milk more than 10 kms. away for Rs.
20 per litre.
The main reason for this distortion was lack of education and
awareness about how locally available cow milk from the Gir cows could be a
valuable source of nutrition for children, which that children asked for, but
were denied because of cultural alienation.
These were just some of my findings. Even as I had to cut
back a detailed study and action to keep up with my family responsibilities in
Ahmedabad. Yet, given an opportunity, I would like to work on increasing rural
livelihood opportunities, productivity and the quality of life.
In course of my stay, I met with Smt. Sarada Muralidharan,
COO of NRLM at a recent meeting in a nearby village in Pavanar. I am enthused
that a program such as NRLM can bridge the gap in Pricing, Education as shared
above and various others as we have come across. Many of these learning as
studied.
With the recent meeting with Sh. Shravan Hardikar with my
associate Col. Alok Asthana in Mumbai, I am enthused that NRLM in Maharashtra may be a
good opportunity to work on this subject, so close to my heart. With
well-designed leadership development and training programs, we could help the
rural sector strengthens its roots as well as adapt to the modern idiom, in an
assured manner.
We learnt in our schools that India lives in its villages.
That message is finally coming home.